The Relationship Between Levels of Anxiety and Family Support with the Selection of Birth Attendants

https://doi.org/10.33860/jik.v17i3.3165

Authors

  • Nurhikmah Nurhikmah Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Graha Edukasi Makassar, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
  • Nur Aliya Arsyad Midwifery Science Study Programme, Graduate School, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
  • Muliyana Muliyana Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Graha Edukasi Makassar, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
  • Reskiawati Azis Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Graha Edukasi Makassar, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Keywords:

Family Support, Pregnant Women, Anxiety, Birth Attendant

Abstract

One of the psychological problems experienced by many pregnant women is their anxiety about choosing a birth attendant. This study aimed to analyze the influence of anxiety levels and family support on the selection of birth attendants. This study used a quantitative observational design and a cross-sectional approach. This study was carried out from November to December 2021 at the Bontomarannu Community Health Center, Gowa Regency, with a sample size of 32 pregnant women. Purposive sampling was used. The results of the study using the chi-square test showed that the level of anxiety was p = 0.007 and family support was p = 0.003 <a = 0.05. twelve pregnant women received poor family support, four (33.3%) respondents were good, and eight (66.7%) pregnant women were not good at choosing birth attendants, of the 32 respondents, 22 were pregnant women with mild levels of anxiety, 15 (68.2%) were good at choosing birth attendants, and 7 (31.8%) were not good. This means that there is a relationship between the level of anxiety and family support, and the choice of birth attendant. It is hoped that pregnant women who are anxious about choosing a birth attendant will always receive more assistance, whether from the family or a midwife so that there is no prolonged anxiety. Midwives are advised that in carrying out any midwifery care, they can identify problems and take action quickly and precisely, especially in carrying out ANC examinations for patients who are preparing for childbirth

References

Gurol-Urganci I, Jardine JE, Carroll F, Draycott T, Dunn G, Fremeaux A, Harris T, Hawdon J, Morris E, Muller P, Waite L. Maternal and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection at the time of birth in England: national cohort study. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2021 Nov 1;225(5):522-e1.

Zha L, Sobue T, Hirayama A, Takeuchi T, Tanaka K, Katayama Y, Komukai S, Shimazu T, Kitamura T. Characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 in reproductive-aged pregnant and nonpregnant women in Osaka, Japan. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2022 Apr 1;117:195-200.

Stafford IA, Parchem JG, Sibai BM. The coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine in pregnancy: risks, benefits, and recommendations. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2021 May 1;224(5):484-95.

Fadaka AO, Sibuyi NR, Adewale OB, Bakare OO, Akanbi MO, Klein A, Madiehe AM, Meyer M. Understanding the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of SARS-CoV-2. Journal of International Medical Research. 2020 Aug;48(8):0300060520949077.

Engjom H, Aabakke AJ, Klungsøyr K, Svanvik T, Äyräs O, Jonasdottir E, Thurn L, Jones E, Pettersson K, Nyfløt LT, Al‐Zirqi I. COVID‐19 in pregnancy—characteristics and outcomes of pregnant women admitted to hospital because of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in the Nordic countries. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2021 Sep;100(9):1611-9.

Eman A, Balaban O, Kocayiğit H, Süner KÖ, Cırdı Y, Erdem AF. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Critically Ill Pregnant and Puerperal Patients Diagnosed with COVID-19 Disease: Retrospective Comparative Study. J Korean Med Sci. 2021;36(44):1–10.

Zhang XY, Huang HJ, Zhuang DL, Nasser MI, Yang MH, Zhu P, et al. Biological, clinical and epidemiological features of COVID-19, SARS and MERS and AutoDock simulation of ACE2. Infect Dis Poverty. 2020;9(1):1–11.

Wiersinga WJ, Rhodes A, Cheng AC, Peacock SJ, Prescott HC. Pathophysiology, Transmission, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Review. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc. 2020;324(8):782–93.

Umakanthan S, Sahu P, Ranade A V., Bukelo MM, Rao JS, Abrahao-Machado LF, et al. Origin, transmission, diagnosis and management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Postgrad Med J. 2020;96(1142):753–8.

AlMalki FA, Albukhaty S, Alyamani AA, Khalaf MN, Thomas S. The relevant information about the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) using the five-question approach (when, where, what, why, and how) and its impact on the environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;2002(November 2002).

Mirbeyk M, Saghazadeh A, Rezaei N. A systematic review of pregnant women with COVID-19 and their neonates. Vol. 304, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2021. 5–38 p.

Sobral MFF, Roazzi A, da Penha Sobral AIG, de Oliveira BRB, Duarte GB, da Silva JF, et al. A retrospective cohort study of 238,000 COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths in Brazil. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):1–11.

Chacon NC, Walia N, Allen A, Sciancalepore A, Tiong J, Quick R, et al. Substance use during COVID-19 pandemic: impact on the underserved communities. Discoveries. 2021;9(4):e141.

Tfi MR, Hamblin MR, Rezaei N. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID- 19 . The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect , the company ’ s public news and information. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;508(January):254–66.

Kemenkes RI. Pedoman Pencegahan dan Pengendalian CORONAVIRUS DISEASE (COVID-19). Jakarta: Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2021.

Castelnau-Marchand P, Chargari C, Bouaita R, Dumas I, Farha G, Kamsu-Kom L, et al. What to expect from immediate salvage hysterectomy following concomitant chemoradiation and image-guided adaptive brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer. Cancer/Radiotherapie. 2015;19(8):710–7.

Pulkkinen J, Kares S, Huhtala H, Kholová I. Detection and outcome of endocervical atypia in cytology in primary hpv screening programme. Diagnostics. 2021;11(12):1–10.

Brüggmann D, Quinkert-Schmolke K, Jaque JM, Quarcoo D, Bohlmann MK, Klingelhöfer D, et al. Global cervical cancer research: A scientometric density equalizing mapping and socioeconomic analysis. PLoS One. 2022;17(1 January):1–21.

Gwede CK, William CM, Thomas KB, Tarver WL, Quinn GP, Vadaparampil ST, Kim J, Lee JH, Meade CD. Exploring disparities and variability in perceptions and self-reported colorectal cancer screening among three ethnic subgroups of US Blacks. Oncology nursing forum 2010 Sep 9 37(5), p.581-91.

Madzima TR, Vahabi M, Lofters A. Emerging role of HPV self-sampling in cervical cancer screening for hard-To-reach women. Can Fam Physician. 2017;63(8):597–601.

Carrasquillo O, Seay J, Jhaveri V, Long T, Kenya S, Thomas E, et al. Increasing uptake of evidence-based screening services though a community health worker-delivered multimodality program: Study protocol for a randomized pragmatic trial. Trials. 2020;21(1):1–9.

Wilcox ML, Acuña JM, De La Vega PR, Castro G, Madhivanan P. Factors affecting compliance with colorectal cancer screening among households residing in the largely haitian community of Little Haiti, Miami-Dade County, Florida. Med (United States). 2015;94(18):1–8.

Tranberg M, Bech BH, Blaakær J, Jensen JS, Svanholm H, Andersen B. Study protocol of the CHOiCE trial: A three-armed, randomized, controlled trial of home-based HPV self-sampling for non-participants in an organized cervical cancer screening program. BMC Cancer. 2016;16(1):1–7.

Sultana F, English DR, Simpson JA, Brotherton JM, Drennan K, Mullins R, Heley S, Wrede CD, Saville M, Gertig DM. Rationale and design of the iPap trial: a randomized controlled trial of home-based HPV self-sampling for improving participation in cervical screening by never-and under-screened women in Australia. BMC cancer. 2014 Dec;14(1):1-11.

Kabakama S, Gallagher KE, Howard N, Mounier-Jack S, Burchett HE, Griffiths UK, Feletto M, LaMontagne DS, Watson-Jones D. Social mobilisation, consent and acceptability: a review of human papillomavirus vaccination procedures in low and middle-income countries. BMC public health. 2016 Dec;16:1-0.

Gallagher KE, Howard N, Kabakama S, Mounier-Jack S, Burchett HE, LaMontagne DS, Watson-Jones D. Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine coverage achievements in low and middle-income countries 2007–2016. Papillomavirus Research. 2017 Dec 1;4:72-8.

Brewer N, Bartholomew K, Maxwell A, Grant J, McPherson G, Wihongi H, et al. Correction: Comparison of two invitation-based methods for human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling with usual care among un- and under-screened Māori, Pacific and Asian women: Study protocol for a randomised controlled community trial to examine the effe. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):1–10.

Diriba K, Awulachew E, Getu E. The effect of coronavirus infection (SARS-CoV-2, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV) during pregnancy and the possibility of vertical maternal-fetal transmission: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Med Res. 2020;25(1):1–14.

Mascio D Di, Khalil A, Saccone G, Rizzo G, Buca D. Systematic Review Outcome of coronavirus spectrum infections. Elsevier. 2020;(January).

Tusyadiah H, Rohani, R. Dukungan Suami Untuk Melaksanakan Program Perencanaan Persalinan Dan Pencegahan Komplikasi (P4K) (Studi Literatur). J Kesehat dan Pembang. 2020;10(20):30–9.

Coxon K, Chisholm A, Malouf R, Rowe R, Hollowell J. What influences birth place preferences, choices and decision-making amongst healthy women with straightforward pregnancies in the UK? A qualitative evidence synthesis using a “best fit” framework approach. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):1–15.

Panda S, Malley DO, Barry P, Vallejo N, Smith V. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID- 19 . The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect , the company ’ s public news and information . 2020;(January).

Keating NE, Dempsey B, Corcoran S, McAuliffe FM, Lalor J, Higgins MF. Women’s experience of pregnancy and birth during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. Ir J Med Sci. 2021;(0123456789).

Downloads

Published

2023-11-18

How to Cite

Nurhikmah, N., Arsyad, N. A. ., Muliyana, M., & Azis, R. . (2023). The Relationship Between Levels of Anxiety and Family Support with the Selection of Birth Attendants. Poltekita: Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan, 17(3), 754–761. https://doi.org/10.33860/jik.v17i3.3165

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.