Towards Zero Maternal Mortality: The Role of Policy Makers in Maternal Perinatal Audit Surveillance and Response

https://doi.org/10.33860/jik.v17i1.2124

Authors

  • Ninik Dwi Ambarwati Faculty of Public Health, Magister of Public Health, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Martha Irene Kartasurya Faculty of Public Health, Magister of Public Health, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Cahya Tri Purnami Faculty of Public Health, Magister of Public Health, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia

Keywords:

Maternal Perinatal Audit, Actor, Policy makers, Surveillance

Abstract

The city of Semarang has formed a Maternal Perinatal Surveillance and Response audit committee team. The purpose of this study is to analyze the role of policy actors in the implementation of Maternal Perinatal Surveillance and Response Audit using the policy triangle framework of actors, content, context and process. This research was conducted qualitatively with a case study approach. The selection of informants was carried out purposively. Data collection by in-depth interviews with 6 main informants and 9 triangulation informants. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis, with the inclusion criteria of health workers having more than 3 years’ experience in handling maternal death cases. The results showed that the role of AMP-SR actors was optimal at the Health Service and Community Health Centers, the role of AMP-SR actors in hospitals was not optimal. Not all of the contents of the AMP-SR were understood by the midwives at the Health Centers and Hospitals, the identification and notifications were on time, the OVM and RMM reports were not complete, the maternal death assessment had not been all carried out, the responses had not been all followed up. The implementation process is hampered by limited staff and budget, medical devices are not routinely calibrated, the MPDN application has been used but is not optimal. In Conclusion, the role of policy makers is AMP-SR, intervening in reducing maternal mortality and improving the quality of care. Future research is expected to use the mixed method to find out the role of policymakers quantitatively and qualitatively.

References

WHO. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2020. World Health Organization. 2023.

Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Profil Kesehatan Indonesia. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. 2021.

Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Laporan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah Tahun 2021. Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Tengah. 2021.

Dinas Kesehatan Kota Semarang. Profil Kesehatan. Dinas Kesehatan Kota Semarang. 2021.

Kodan LR. Maternal mortality audit in Suriname between 2010 and 2014, a reproductive age mortality survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1).

Smith H. Implementing maternal death surveillance and response in Kenya: Incremental progress and lessons learned. Glob Heal Sci Pract. 2017;5(3):345–54.

Koblinsky M. Maternal Death Surveillance and Response: A Tall Order for Effectiveness in Resource-Poor Settings. 2017 Sep.

Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Audit Maternal Perinatal Surveilans dan Respons. In 2022.

Srivastava A, Singh D, Montagu D, Bhattacharyya S. Putting women at the center: A review of Indian policy to address person-centered care in maternal and newborn health, family planning and abortion. BMC Public Health. 2017;18(1):1–10.

Adisasmita A, Smith C V., El-Mohandes AAE, Deviany PE, Ryon JJ, Kiely M, et al. Maternal Characteristics and Clinical Diagnoses Influence Obstetrical Outcomes in Indonesia. Matern Child Health J. 2015;19(7):1624–33.

Mathur A, Awin N, Adisasmita A, Jayaratne K, Francis S, Sharma S, et al. Maternal death review in selected countries of South East Asia Region. BJOG. 2014;121(May):67–70.

Cahyanti RD, Widyawati W, Hakimi M. “Sharp downward, blunt upward”: district maternal death audits’ challenges to formulate evidence-based recommendations in Indonesia - a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Dec;21(1).

Atiyah FU, Sundari S, Rosa EM. Analyzing of implementation maternal audit program in community health center: a qualitative study. Int J Community Med Public Heal. 2021 Sep;8(10):4767.

Fahmi MA. Evaluasi Program Audit Maternal Perinatal (AMP) Di Kabupaten Temanggung Jawa Tengah. J Penelit Kesehat Suara Forikes . 2017 Apr;VIII(3):109–15.

Maryati S, Sutopo, Jati P, Ratna L, Wulan K. Analis Program Audit Maternal-Perinatal (AMP) di Kabupaten Cianjur Tahun 2012. 2019 Jul.

Mahudin R, Jati SP, Sriatmi A. Faktor Pendukung dan Penghambat Implementasi Kegiatan Audit Maternal Perinatal (AMP) di Kota Semarang (Study kasus pada Puskesmas Kedungmundu, Rumah Sakit Tugurejo dan Dinas Kesehatan Kota Semarang. 2020 Mar;3:323–7.

El-Jardali F, Bou-Karroum L, Ataya N, El-Ghali HA, Hammoud R. A retrospective health policy analysis of the development and implementation of the voluntary health insurance system in Lebanon: Learning from failure. Soc Sci Med. 2014;123(2014):45–54.

O’Brien GL, Sinnott SJ, Walshe V, Mulcahy M, Byrne S. Health policy triangle framework: Narrative review of the recent literature. Heal Policy OPEN. 2020;1(2020):100016.

van de Goor I, Hämäläinen RM, Syed A, Juel Lau C, Sandu P, Spitters H, et al. Determinants of evidence use in public health policy making: Results from a study across six EU countries. Health Policy (New York). 2017;121(3):273–81.

Speakman EM, Shafi A, Sondorp E, Atta N, Howard N. Development of the Community Midwifery Education initiative and its influence on women’s health and empowerment in Afghanistan: A case study. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14(1):1–12.

Buse K, Mays N, Walt G. Making health policy. McGraw-hill education (UK); 2012.

Mathole T, Lembani M, Jackson D, Zarowsky C, Bijlmakers L, Sanders D. Leadership and the functioning of maternal health services in two rural district hospitals in South Africa. Health Policy Plan. 2018;33:ii5–15.

D’Andreamatteo A, Ianni L, Lega F, Sargiacomo M. Lean in healthcare: A comprehensive review. Health Policy (New York). 2015;119(9):1197–209.

Etiaba E, Uguru N, Ebenso B, Russo G, Ezumah N, Uzochukwu B. Development of oral health policy in Nigeria : an analysis of the role of context , actors and policy process. 2015;1–10.

Bandali S, Thomas C, Hukin E, Matthews Z, Mathai M, Ramachandran Dilip T, et al. Maternal Death Surveillance and Response Systems in driving accountability and influencing change. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Dec;135(3):365–71.

Tayebwa E, Sayinzoga F, Umunyana J, Thapa K, Ajayi E, Kim YM, et al. Assessing implementation of maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response in Rwanda. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(12):1–11.

Willcox ML, Okello IA, Maidwell-Smith A, Tura AK, van den Akker T, Knight M. Maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Bull World Health Organ. 2023;101(1):62-75G.

Kerber KJ. Counting every stillbirth and neonatal death through mortality audit to improve quality of care for every pregnant woman and her baby. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15.

Abebe B, Busza J, Hadush A, Usmael A, Zeleke AB, Sita S, et al. ‘We identify, discuss, act and promise to prevent similar deaths’: A qualitative study of Ethiopia’s Maternal Death Surveillance and Response system. Vol. 2, BMJ Global Health. BMJ Publishing Group; 2017.

Stokes T. Barriers and enablers to guideline implementation strategies to improve obstetric care practice in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Implement Sci. 2016;11(1).

Agaro C, Beyeza-kashesya J, Waiswa P, Sekandi JN, Tusiime S, Anguzu R, et al. The conduct of maternal and perinatal death reviews in Oyam District , Uganda : a descriptive cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health. 2016;1–13.

Armstrong CE. Strengths and weaknesses in the implementation of maternal and perinatal death reviews in Tanzania: Perceptions, processes and practice. Trop Med Int Heal. 2014;19(9):1087–95.

Rhoda NR. Experiences with perinatal death reviews in South Africa--the Perinatal Problem Identification Programme: scaling up from programme to province to country. BJOG. 2014;121:160–6.

Access O. Evaluation of the maternal mortality surveillance system in Mutare district, Zimbabwe, 2014-2015: a cross sectional study. 2017;8688:2014–5.

Biswas A, Rahman F, Eriksson C, Halim A, Dalal K. Social Autopsy of maternal , neonatal deaths and stillbirths in rural Bangladesh : qualitative exploration of its effect and community acceptance. 2016;1–9.

Melberg A, Mirkuzie AH, Sisay TA, Sisay MM, Moland KM. ‘ Maternal deaths should simply be 0 ’: politicization of maternal death reporting and review processes in Ethiopia. 2019;(July):492–8.

Abouchadi S, Godin I, Zhang WH, De Brouwere V. Eight-year experience of maternal death surveillance in Morocco: qualitative study of stakeholders’ views at a subnational level. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1–15.

D’Ambruoso L. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity in rural Indonesia Part 1: The community perspective. Soc Med. 2013;7(2):47–67.

Magoma M, Massinde A, Majinge C, Rumanyika R, Kihunrwa A, Gomodoka B. Maternal death reviews at Bugando hospital north-western Tanzania: A 2008-2012 retrospective analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):1–7.

Hofman J. Experiences with facility-based maternal death reviews in northern Nigeria. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2014;126(2):111–4.

Moucheraud C, Owen H, Singh NS, Ng CK, Requejo J, Lawn JE, et al. Countdown to 2015 country case studies: What have we learned about processes and progress towards MDGs 4 and 5? BMC Public Health. 2016;16(Suppl 2).

Downloads

Published

2023-05-28

How to Cite

Ambarwati, N. D. ., Kartasurya, M. I., & Purnami , C. . T. . (2023). Towards Zero Maternal Mortality: The Role of Policy Makers in Maternal Perinatal Audit Surveillance and Response . Poltekita: Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan, 17(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.33860/jik.v17i1.2124

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.