Health Communication Strategies for Wolbachia Mosquito Implementation in Dengue Prevention: A Case Study in Bontang City

https://doi.org/10.33860/jik.v19i2.4204

Authors

  • Suraji Heri Prasetiyo Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Central Java, Indonesia
  • Pawito Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Central Java, Indonesia
  • Likha Sari Anggreni Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Central Java, Indonesia

Keywords:

Wolbachia, health communication, dengue fever, Bontang City, community participation

Abstract

Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF) remains a serious public health issue in Indonesia. One of the innovations developed to reduce the number of DHF cases is the implementation of Wolbachia-infected Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. This study aims to describe and evaluate the health communication strategies used in the implementation of Wolbachia mosquitoes in Bontang City, East Kalimantan The study employs a qualitative case study design, using four Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with 32 participants, including community health volunteers (cadres, i.e. community health volunteers), household foster parents, sub-district officials, and health center staff. Thematic analysis was conducted with source triangulation to ensure data validity based on community perceptions, the socialization process, implementation challenges, and stakeholder support.. The results indicate mixed outcomes: positive acceptance was initially supported by trust in health workers, clear explanations of Wolbachia’s biological role, and active involvement of community volunteers; however, several obstacles reduced support, including ongoing dengue cases, perceived increase in mosquito populations, misinformation and hoaxes on social media, weak cross-sector coordination, and cadre turnover without transition. Discontinuous communication strategies weakened the effectiveness of health message delivery to the community. Strengthening risk communication, broader public campaigns, and routine cross-sector evaluations are needed to ensure the program’s sustainability.

References

1. Wongkar, Emili Y, Langitan F, Telew A. Analisis Pelaksanaan Program Penanggulangan Demam Berdarah Dengue (DBD) Di Puskesmas Pineleng Kabupaten Minahasa. J Ilm Kesehat Manad. 2024;(3(2)). https://jurnal.jikma.net/index.php/jikma/article/view/124

2. Theresia N. Dengue High Fever/Demam Dengue. Keperawatan Penyakit Infeksi Tropis; 2024. 31 p. Penerbit Pradina Pustaka; 2024

3. Firdausi RI, Bestari RS, Dewi LM, Nurhayani N. Peran Bakteri Wolbachia Terhadap Pengendalian Vektor Demam Berdarah Dengue (DBD) Aedes aegypti. 13th Univ Res Colloqium. 2021;

4. Triono AW. Evaluasi Strategi Komunikasi dalam Pelaksanaan Program CSR. J Commun Manag Organ. 2023;(2(2)):78–87. https://journal.rc-communication.com/index.php/JCMO/article/view/203

5. Saputra FR, Wahid I, Sjahril R, Syafruddin D, Rani S, Bahar B. Bukti Baru Infeksi Natural Wolbachia Sp. Pada Aedes Aegypti Dengan Aedes Albopictus Dari Makassar. J Vektor Penyakit. 2020;(14(2)):113–8. https://doi.org/10.22435/vektorp.v14i1.2424

6. Saleh M. Jejak Biologis Larva sebagai Atraktan dan Dampaknya terhadap Indikator Vektor. Penerbit Adab; 2024.

7. Nurjanah A, Sativa SZ, Astuti AD, Rangkuti SR, Nafisah N, Fitri N, et al. Analisis Kebijakan Kesehatan Mendorong Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Program Pencegahan Penyakit. J Anestesi. 2024;(2(3)):178–92.

8. Yanti M, Khairunnisa K, Mardiyanti D, Situngkir D. Promosi kesehatan. Ganesha Kreasi Semesta; 2024.

9. Novayanti LH, Widhiasthini NW. Wolbachia Tertunda: Analisis Faktor Penghambat Implementasi Program. J Adm Publik. 2024;(15(2)). https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/jap/article/view/26746

10. Achjar K, Rusliyadi M, Zaenurrosyid A, Rumata N, Nirwana I, Abadi A. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Panduan Praktis Untuk Analisis Data Kualitatif Dan Studi Kasus. Yogyakarta: PT Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia; 2023.

11. Mulyana A, Vidiati C, Danarahmanto PA, Agussalim A, Apriani W, Fiansi F, et al. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Penerbit Widina; 2024.

12. Sugarda YB. Panduan Praktis Pelaksanaan Focus Group Discussion Sebagai Metode Riset Kualitatif. Gramedia Pustaka Utama; 2020.

13. Nurhayati N, Apriyanto A, Ahsan J, Hidayah N. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Teori dan Praktik. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia; 2024.

14. Sitasari NW. Mengenal Analisa Konten Dan Analisa Tematik Dalam Penelitian Kualitatif. Forum Ilm. 2022;(Vol. 19, No. 1):77–84. https://digilib.esaunggul.ac.id/public/UEU-Journal-23188-11_2248.pdf

15. Susanto D, Jailani MS. Teknik Pemeriksaan Keabsahan Data Dalam Penelitian Ilmiah. QOSIM J Pendidik Sos Hum. 2023;(1(1)):53–61. https://ejournal.yayasanpendidikandzurriyatulquran.id/index.php/qosim/article/view/60

16. Arminta, Hilmi M, Roestyaningsih D, Warsono H. Implementasi Program Wolbachia Dalam Penanganan Kasus Dbd Di Kota Semarang. J Public Policy Manag Rev. 2024;(13(4)):454–73. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jppmr/article/view/47403

17. Gerung J. Media Sosial dalam Digital Marketing Kesehatan. Guepedia; 2021.

18. Ummah, Izzatul S, Lestari P. Audit Komunikasi Tentang Program Pelayanan Pasien BPJS. J Herit. 2024;(12(1)):14–32.

19. Irfandi A. Kajian Pemanfaatan Wolbachia Terhadap Pengendalian DBD (Studi Literatur dan Studi Kasus Pemanfaatan Wolbachia di Yogyakarta). Forum Ilm. 2018;(15(2)).

20. Amrullah, Amir A, Safitriani VA, Rohadatul’Aisy A, Rajebta NA, Karimah AS. Penyebaran Nyamuk Wolbachia Sebagai Pencegahan Demam Berdarah dalam Perspektif Prinsip Etika Beneficence. Innov J Soc Sci Res. 2024;(4(3)):15341–9. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/12419

21. Nazni WA, Hoffmann AA, NoorAfizah A, Cheong YL, Mancini M V., Golding N, et al. Establishment of Wolbachia Strain wAlbB in Malaysian Populations of Aedes aegypti for Dengue Control. Curr Biol [Internet]. 2019;29(24):4241-4248.e5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.11.007

22. Patmawati Dewi, Suparni, Mahwati Yeni. Efektivitas Wolbachia Dalam Pengendalian Demam Berdarah Dengue. J Sehat Masada. 2025;19(1):49–61. https://ejurnal.stikesdhb.ac.id/index.php/Jsm/article/view/517

23. Anders KL, Indriani C, Tantowijoyo W, Rancès E, Andari B, Prabowo E, et al. Reduced Dengue Incidence Following Deployments Of Wolbachia-Infected Aedes Aegypti In Yogyakarta, Indonesia: A quasi-experimental trial using controlled interrupted time series analysis. Gates Open Res. 2020;4. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3544812

24. Utarini A, Indriani C, Ahmad RA, Tantowijoyo W, Arguni E, Ansari MR, et al. Efficacy of Wolbachia-Infected Mosquito Deployments for the Control of Dengue. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(23):2177–86. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2030243

25. Novayanti LH, Whidhiastini NW. Challenges in Adapting Wolbachia Technology for Dengue Control. J Penelit Pendidik IPA. 2025;11(3):237–49. https://jppipa.unram.ac.id/index.php/jppipa/article/view/9945

Downloads

Published

2025-11-01

How to Cite

Prasetiyo, S. H., Pawito, P., & Anggreni, L. S. (2025). Health Communication Strategies for Wolbachia Mosquito Implementation in Dengue Prevention: A Case Study in Bontang City. Poltekita: Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan, 19(2), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.33860/jik.v19i2.4204

Issue

Section

Case Study Article

Similar Articles

<< < 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.